1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1994 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1994 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 580 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Nissan Pulsar (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1994 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 1994 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Suzuki | Nissan |
| Model | Fronte | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1994 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 1594 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2440 mm |
