1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1999 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1999 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Volkswagen Polo (74 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 490 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Volkswagen Polo (135 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1999 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Suzuki Fronte | 1999 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Suzuki | Volkswagen |
Model | Fronte | Polo |
Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
Engine Size | 358 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2410 mm |