1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2001 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2001 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP @ 2000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2001 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2001 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Suzuki | Nissan |
| Model | Fronte | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 2184 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1600 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2540 mm |
