1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (188 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1516 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
| Model | Fronte | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 3376 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 188 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 2016 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3270 mm |
