1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,422 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 866 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (196 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2004 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2004 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Suzuki | Volkswagen |
Model | Fronte | Polo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 358 cc | 1422 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 196 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1366 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2520 mm |