1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser (240 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 1181 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser (376 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 344 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
| Model | Fronte | Land Cruiser |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 3956 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 376 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1681 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2610 mm |
