1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser (164 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 1415 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser (410 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
Model | Fronte | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 358 cc | 2982 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 410 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2460 mm |