1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2007 Volvo C30
To start off, 2007 Volvo C30 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,501 cc (5 cylinders), 2007 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Volvo C30 (300 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Volvo C30 weights approximately 779 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Volvo C30 (400 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2007 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2007 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
| Model | Fronte | C30 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2007 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 2501 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1950 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1279 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1770 mm |
