1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 1302 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (368 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Suzuki | Cadillac |
| Model | Fronte | STS |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 3600 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 368 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1802 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1844 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1463 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2957 mm |
