1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Citroen C6
To start off, 2010 Citroen C6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C6 (209 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C6 weights approximately 1315 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C6 (290 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Citroen C6 | |
Make | Suzuki | Citroen |
Model | Fronte | C6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 358 cc | 2946 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 209 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2910 mm |