1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 326 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 498 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Suzuki | Holden |
Model | Fronte | Caprice |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 358 cc | 6000 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 32 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |