1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2010 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lincoln Navigator (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 2137 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lincoln Navigator (494 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 462 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2010 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Lincoln Navigator | |
| Make | Suzuki | Lincoln |
| Model | Fronte | Navigator |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 5400 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 310 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 494 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 2637 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 5293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 2002 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1989 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3023 mm |
