1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 910 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 6 (165 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Suzuki | Mazda |
Model | Fronte | 6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 358 cc | 1798 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2789 mm |