1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (114 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 951 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
| Model | Fronte | C30 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 1600 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2639 mm |
