1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (510 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 492 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jaguar XF weights approximately 1453 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (624 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 592 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Suzuki | Jaguar |
| Model | Fronte | XF |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 5000 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 510 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 624 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1953 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2908 mm |
