1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Clio (81 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Renault Clio weights approximately 675 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2011 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2011 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Suzuki | Renault |
| Model | Fronte | Clio |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 1460 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2580 mm |
