1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2012 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2012 Dodge Ram is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Ram (390 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 372 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1918 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Ram (551 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 519 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2012 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2012 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Suzuki | Dodge |
Model | Fronte | Ram |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 358 cc | 5700 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 551 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 2418 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 5817 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3569 mm |