1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2012 Kia Optima
To start off, 2012 Kia Optima is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Kia Optima (200 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Optima weights approximately 962 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Kia Optima (252 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2012 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2012 Kia Optima | |
Make | Suzuki | Kia |
Model | Fronte | Optima |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 358 cc | 2400 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 252 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1462 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4844 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1831 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2797 mm |