1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 255 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1463 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Suzuki | Mazda |
Model | Fronte | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 358 cc | 3700 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1963 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2875 mm |