1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,332 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2012 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2012 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Suzuki | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Fronte | Colt |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 1332 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 3640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2500 mm |
