1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2012 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2012 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1496 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota 4Runner (376 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 344 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2012 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
Model | Fronte | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 358 cc | 4000 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 376 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2789 mm |