1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford C-MAX (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 1254 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford C-MAX (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2013 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
| Make | Suzuki | Ford |
| Model | Fronte | C-MAX |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 2000 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 139 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1754 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4409 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 2085 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1621 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2649 mm |
