1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 878 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (200 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Mazda |
| Model | Fronte | 3 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1378 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4595 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2640 mm |
