1963 Toyota Crown vs. 1996 Honda Integra
To start off, 1996 Honda Integra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,897 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda Integra (143 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1963 Toyota Crown. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1963 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Toyota Crown weights approximately 56 kg more than 1996 Honda Integra.
Because 1963 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Toyota Crown | 1996 Honda Integra | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | Crown | Integra |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1897 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2570 mm |