1963 Toyota Crown vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C70 weights approximately 485 kg more than 1963 Toyota Crown.
Because 1963 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C70 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Toyota Crown. (152 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Toyota Crown | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Crown | C70 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1897 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 152 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 1250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4582 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |
