1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 1961 Triumph TR3
To start off, 1963 Triumph 2000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 2,138 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Triumph TR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Triumph TR3 (101 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Triumph TR3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 266 kg more than 1961 Triumph TR3.
Let's talk about torque, 1961 Triumph TR3 (172 Nm @ 3350 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1961 Triumph TR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Triumph 2000 | 1961 Triumph TR3 | |
| Make | Triumph | Triumph |
| Model | 2000 | TR3 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3350 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.8 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 904 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 53 L |
