1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 1965 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1965 Triumph Vitesse is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1965 Triumph Vitesse. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph Vitesse. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1965 Triumph Vitesse. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph Vitesse. (126 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Triumph 2000 | 1965 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Triumph | Triumph |
Model | 2000 | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1963 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.8 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 29 L |