1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 1970 Triumph Toledo
To start off, 1970 Triumph Toledo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1970 Triumph Toledo. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph Toledo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1970 Triumph Toledo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph Toledo. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph Toledo.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Triumph 2000 | 1970 Triumph Toledo | |
Make | Triumph | Triumph |
Model | 2000 | Toledo |
Year Released | 1963 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.8 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 63 L |