1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 1981 Nissan Laurel
To start off, 1981 Nissan Laurel is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Nissan Laurel (102 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Nissan Laurel should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1981 Nissan Laurel.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Nissan Laurel (163 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1981 Nissan Laurel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Triumph 2000 | 1981 Nissan Laurel | |
Make | Triumph | Nissan |
Model | 2000 | Laurel |
Year Released | 1963 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1952 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2410 mm |