1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 1999 Holden Vectra
To start off, 1999 Holden Vectra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Holden Vectra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Holden Vectra (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Holden Vectra should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Holden Vectra weights approximately 130 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Vectra (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Holden Vectra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Triumph 2000 | 1999 Holden Vectra | |
Make | Triumph | Holden |
Model | 2000 | Vectra |
Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2650 mm |