1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 1999 Honda Capa
To start off, 1999 Honda Capa is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1999 Honda Capa. (97 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1999 Honda Capa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1999 Honda Capa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Honda Capa. (136 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Honda Capa.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Triumph 2000 | 1999 Honda Capa | |
| Make | Triumph | Honda |
| Model | 2000 | Capa |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2370 mm |
