1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 2010 Pontiac Vibe
To start off, 2010 Pontiac Vibe is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 130 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Pontiac Vibe. (128 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Pontiac Vibe.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Triumph 2000 | 2010 Pontiac Vibe | |
| Make | Triumph | Pontiac |
| Model | 2000 | Vibe |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
