1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz B
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz B is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz B (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz B should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mercedes-Benz B weights approximately 270 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mercedes-Benz B (250 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Mercedes-Benz B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Triumph 2000 | 2011 Mercedes-Benz B | |
Make | Triumph | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 2000 | B |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.8 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 54 L |