1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 2012 BMW X3
To start off, 2012 BMW X3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW X3 (256 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW X3 weights approximately 680 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW X3 (560 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Triumph 2000 | 2012 BMW X3 | |
Make | Triumph | BMW |
Model | 2000 | X3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 560 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.8 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4648 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1881 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1675 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2810 mm |