1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Triumph 2000 | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Triumph | Holden |
Model | 2000 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 158 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2685 mm |