1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,138 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 (104 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. (90 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 should accelerate faster than 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 55 kg more than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Triumph | Mitsubishi |
Model | Dove GTR4 | Sigma |
Year Released | 1963 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2138 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2520 mm |