1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. (104 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Charger weights approximately 701 kg more than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | Triumph | Dodge |
| Model | Dove GTR4 | Charger |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2138 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1716 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5083 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3048 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 68 L |
