1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 vs. 2010 Hyundai Getz
To start off, 2010 Hyundai Getz is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,138 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 104 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Hyundai Getz weights approximately 148 kg more than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4.
Because 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Hyundai Getz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | 2010 Hyundai Getz | |
| Make | Triumph | Hyundai |
| Model | Dove GTR4 | Getz |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2138 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1163 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 45 L |
