1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (235 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. (104 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 599 kg more than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Triumph | Jaguar |
Model | Dove GTR4 | XJ |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2138 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1614 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 85 L |