1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (141 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. (104 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 851 kg more than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Triumph | Mazda |
| Model | Dove GTR4 | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2138 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1866 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 70 L |
