1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 vs. 2012 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2012 Fiat Bravo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,138 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 104 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 420 kg more than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4.
Because 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | 2012 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | Triumph | Fiat |
| Model | Dove GTR4 | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2138 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 57 L |
