1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. (104 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 869 kg more than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Triumph | Jaguar |
| Model | Dove GTR4 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2138 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 335 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1884 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5127 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2105 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3032 mm |
