1963 Triumph Herald vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (470 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 432 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XF weights approximately 1173 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (574 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 491 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Triumph Herald | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Triumph | Jaguar |
Model | Herald | XF |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1147 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 470 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 574 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 70 L |