1963 Triumph Spitfire vs. 2010 Mazda 3

To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Spitfire. (62 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Spitfire.

Because 1963 Triumph Spitfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Spitfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Spitfire. (91 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Spitfire.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Triumph Spitfire 2010 Mazda 3
Make Triumph Mazda
Model Spitfire 3
Year Released 1963 2010
Body Type Convertible Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1147 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 62 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 91 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 3690 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1450 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1210 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2110 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 55 L