1963 Triumph Vitesse vs. 2003 Saleen S7
To start off, 2003 Saleen S7 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Saleen S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Saleen S7 (550 HP) has 480 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Saleen S7 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Saleen S7 weights approximately 367 kg more than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Triumph Vitesse | 2003 Saleen S7 | |
Make | Triumph | Saleen |
Model | Vitesse | S7 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 7000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 550 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1981 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1041 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2692 mm |