1963 TVR Griffith vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 TVR Griffith is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 TVR Griffith. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 TVR Griffith | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | TVR | Ford |
Model | Griffith | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2490 mm |