1963 Volkswagen 1500 vs. 2012 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2012 Dodge Challenger is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Challenger (305 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 809 kg more than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Volkswagen 1500 | 2012 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Dodge |
| Model | 1500 | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1493 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6350 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1739 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 5022 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2946 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 72 L |
