1963 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia vs. 2002 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ranger (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1963 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia. (43 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 874 kg more than 1963 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ranger (207 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia. (86 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia. 2002 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1963 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia has manual transmission. 1963 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia 2002 Ford Ranger
Make Volkswagen Ford
Model Karmann-Ghia Ranger
Year Released 1963 2002
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 1285 cc 2300 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 43 HP 128 HP
Engine RPM 4100 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 86 Nm 207 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 846 kg 1720 kg
Vehicle Length 4200 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1640 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 55 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]