1963 Volvo 120 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1963 Volvo 120. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1963 Volvo 120.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Volvo 120. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (230 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Volvo 120. (144 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Volvo 120 | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Volvo | Chevrolet |
Model | 120 | Captiva |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1778 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 230 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 65 L |