1963 Wartburg 312 vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1963 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1963 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Wartburg 312 | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Wartburg | Mazda |
Model | 312 | 6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 900 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.6:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 64 L |